Utah creates loophole to encourage use of more illegal alien's, workers no longer covered under workman's compensation, employers skate
written by Joe638NYC
at Sunday, July 27, 2008
clip from The Salt Lake Tribune article "Insurance loophole makes it easy for employers to exploit illegal workers" by Paul Rolley (7/26/08):
If they were in any way sincere, the employer would have to be liable directly if they hired the illegal alien, but no, that isn't good business.
This reminds me of another recent bill that was floating around Kansas, where it was proposed that any organization that help illegal aliens and collected dues would be subjected to fines of up to $2,000 USD, while the employer who hired them went without penalty.
This is getting worse people, spread the word.Republicans, while pretending to want to close the borders, do everything in their power to allow the use of illegal aliens.
The law basically allows Workers Comp, or any other insurer that covers injured-worker benefits, to cancel disability payments to someone hurt on the job if it is shown that person has committed a crime, including being in the country illegally.Maybe I'm in the wrong field, with all the protections that companies have avoiding the use of American and legal labor, I could make a mint.
But, get this, there is no provision in the law to sanction the employer for hiring someone who is in the country illegally, and the injured worker denied the disability benefits cannot pay an attorney to represent him or her against the insurance company's actions, according to Labor Commission rules.
Call it the employer have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too bill.
Under the new law, and its interpretation by the Labor Commission, a construction company, say, can hire laborers to perform dangerous manual jobs and if a laborer gets hurt the company can escape liability by having the insurance company throw out the benefits if the employee cannot prove he or she is in the country legally. And, the employer isn't sanctioned for having certified the employee was legally eligible for work when he or she was hired in the first place.
Opponents of the law say it encourages employers to hire illegal immigrants because it guarantees not having its insurance company be liable, affecting its premiums, in case the worker is injured on the job.
In fact, the South Carolina Supreme Court said just that in a recent ruling against a similar law passed in that state.
If they were in any way sincere, the employer would have to be liable directly if they hired the illegal alien, but no, that isn't good business.
This reminds me of another recent bill that was floating around Kansas, where it was proposed that any organization that help illegal aliens and collected dues would be subjected to fines of up to $2,000 USD, while the employer who hired them went without penalty.
This is getting worse people, spread the word.Republicans, while pretending to want to close the borders, do everything in their power to allow the use of illegal aliens.
October 25, 2008 at 6:07 PM
http://searchwarp.com/swa61485.htm
Immigration article.
Utah highly favors the hiring of illegal immigration and has welcomed over 250,000 illegals to help its economy. Despite public protests, the state looks the other way and continues to allow the exploit and growth of what it conveniently calls "Latino" community.